Between Money and the Planet? The Interests of Post-colonial Countries in Climate Negotiations

Elbinsar Purba
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.25077/ajis.13.2.158-173.2024

Abstract

This paper explores the interests of post-colonial countries in climate negotiations. It does so by analysing what they need and demand as a consequence of injustice and damages caused by colonialism, which have not been extensively discussed in the current literature. Using content analysis as a methodological approach, the author collected and examined country statements delivered at the Conferences of the Parties (COP) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The analysis reveals that there are three needs and three demands that commonly lie in the interest of formerly colonised countries. Among them, securing financial resources stands high in their priority. However, this does not mean that provision of funding lessens their perception of historical injustice. They still demand for substantive actions from developed countries to correct the past wrongdoings. While some experts suggest transfer of more resources from the Global North to the Global South to ease the climate decision making process, this paper highlights that although such measure might help build trust, it does not necessarily break the deadlock in climate negotiations.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Angola (2022) ‘Statement by Angola at COP 27’. UNFCCC Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents (Accessed: 15 June 2024).

Angola (2023) ‘Statement by Angola at COP 28’. UNFCCC Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents (Accessed: 15 June 2024).

Antigua and Barbuda (2021) Agreement for the establishment of the commission of small island states on climate change and international law. Available at: https://www.cosis-ccil.org/storage/documents/I-56940-08000002805c2ace.pdf.

Antigua and Barbuda (2022) ‘Statement by Antigua and Barbuda on behalf of the alliance of small island states’. UNFCCC Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents (Accessed: 15 June 2024).

Bagozzi, B.E. (2014) ‘The multifaceted nature of global climate change negotiations’, The Review of International Organizations, 10(4), pp. 439–464. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9211-7.

Baumert, K.A., Herzog, T. and Pershing, J. (2005) Navigating the numbers - greenhouse gas data and international climate policy. USA: World Resources Institute. Available at: https://pdf.wri.org/navigating_numbers.pdf.

Belize (2023) ‘Statement by Belize at COP 28’. UNFCCC Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents (Accessed: 15 June 2024).

Bhambra, G.K. and Newell, P. (2023) ‘More than a metaphor: “Climate colonialism” in perspective’, Global Social Challenges Journal, 2(2), pp. 179–187. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1332/EIEM6688.

Botzen, W.J.W., Gowdy, J.M. and Bergh, J.C.J.M.V.D. (2008) ‘Cumulative CO2 emissions: Shifting international responsibilities for climate debt’, Climate Policy, 8(6), pp. 569–576. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2008.0539.

Caney, S. (2006) ‘Environmental degradation, reparations, and the moral significance of history’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 37(3), pp. 464–482. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2006.00348.x.

CARICOM (2023) ‘Joint Statement of the Heads of Government of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) at COP 28’. UNFCCC Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents (Accessed: 15 June 2024).

Casado-Asensio, J., Blaquier, D. and Sedemund, J. (2022) Strengthening capacity for climate action in developing countries: Overview and recommendations. OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers 105. Paris: OECD.

Costantini, V., Sforna, G. and Zoli, M. (2016) ‘Interpreting bargaining strategies of developing countries in climate negotiations. A quantitative approach’, Ecological Economics, 121, pp. 128–139. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.026.

Dhillon, J. (2022) Indigenous resurgence: Decolonialization and movements for environmental justice. 1st edn. Berghahn Books. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3167/9781800732452.

Dimitrov, R.S. (2010) ‘Inside UN climate change negotiations: The Copenhagen conference’, Review of Policy Research, 27(6), pp. 795–821. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00472.x.

Feffer, J. (2023) ‘What climate debt does the North owe the South?’, Third World Resurgence, pp. 23–27.

Ford, J.D. et al. (2016) ‘Including indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports’, Nature Climate Change, 6(4), pp. 349–353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2954.

Friman, M. and Hjerpe, M. (2014) ‘Agreement, significance, and understandings of historical responsibility in climate change negotiations’, Climate Policy, 15(3), pp. 302–320. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.916598.

Friman, M. and Strandberg, G. (2014) ‘Historical responsibility for climate change: Science and the science–policy interface’, WIREs Climate Change, 5(3), pp. 297–316. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.270.

Funes, Y. (2022) ‘Yes, colonialism caused climate change, IPCC reports’, 4 April. Available at: https://atmos.earth/ipcc-report-colonialism-climate-change/ (Accessed: 20 August 2024).

Ghana (2022) ‘Statement by Ghana at COP 27’. UNFCCC Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents (Accessed: 15 June 2024).

Halme, P. (2007) ‘Carbon debt and the (in)significance of history’, Trames-Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(4), p. 346. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2007.4.02.

Honduras (2023) ‘Statement by Honduras at COP 28 on behalf of the Coalition of Tropical Forest Countries’. UNFCCC Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents (Accessed: 15 June 2024).

Kreibiehl, S. et al. (2022) ‘Investment and finance’, in P.R. Shukla et al. (eds) Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 1st edn. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1547–1640. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.017.

Lanneau, R. (2021) ‘Climate justice from the point of view of game theory’, Revue juridique de l’Océan Indien, pp. 131–140.

Malaysia (2023) ‘Statement by Malaysia at COP 28’. UNFCCC Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents (Accessed: 15 June 2024).

Mason-Case, S. and Dehm, J. (2021) ‘Redressing historical responsibility for the unjust precarities of climate change in the present’, in B. Mayer and A. Zahar (eds) Debating Climate Law. 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, pp. 170–189. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108879064.014.

Najam, A., Huq, S. and Sokona, Y. (2003) ‘Climate negotiations beyond Kyoto: Developing countries concerns and interests’, Climate Policy, 3(3), pp. 221–231. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2003.0329.

Nieto, J., Carpintero, Ó. and Miguel, L.J. (2018) ‘Less than 2°C? An economic-environmental evaluation of the Paris agreement’, Ecological Economics, 146, pp. 69–84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.007.

OECD (n.a.) Official development assistance (ODA). Available at: https://www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-standards/official-development-assistance.htm (Accessed: 20 February 2024).

Our World in Data (2023) ‘Years a country was an European overseas colony’. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/years-colonized (Accessed: 1 July 2024).

Pathak, M. et al. (2022) ‘Technical summary’, in P.R. Shukla et al. (eds) Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 1st edn. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926.002.

Pörtner, H.-O. et al. (2022) Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability - Working Group II contribution to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.

Rajamani, L. (2000) ‘The principle of common but differentiated responsibility and the balance of commitments under the climate regime’, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 9(2), pp. 120–131. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9388.00243.

Rajão, R. and Duarte, T. (2018) ‘Performing postcolonial identities at the United Nations’ climate negotiations’, Postcolonial Studies, 21(3), pp. 364–378. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2018.1482597.

Rees, W.E. and Westra, L. (2003) ‘When consumption does violence: Can there be sustainability and environmental justice in a resource-limited world?’, in J. Agyeman, R.D. Bullard, and B. Evans (eds) Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World. MIT Press.

Roberts, J.T. and Parks, B. (2006) A climate of injustice: Global inequality, North-South politics, and climate policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Available at: https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262681612/a-climate-of-injustice/.

Sachs, J.D. (2015) The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.

São Tomé and Príncipe (2023) ‘Statement by São Tomé and Príncipe at COP 28’. UNFCCC Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents (Accessed: 15 June 2024).

Sforna, G. (2019) ‘Climate change and developing countries: from background actors to protagonists of climate negotiations’, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19(3), pp. 273–295. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-019-09435-w.

Shue, H. (2014) ‘Changing images of climate change: Human rights and future generations’, Journal of Human Rights and Environment, 50(5), pp. 50–64. Available at: https://doi. org/10.4337/jhre.2014.02.06.

Singh, N. (2023) ‘Climate justice in the Global South: Understanding the environmental legacy of colonialism’, in F. Corvino and T. Andina (eds) Global climate justice: Theory and practice. Bristol, England: E-International Relations.

Sri Lanka (2022) ‘Statement by Sri Lanka at COP 27’. UNFCCC Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents (Accessed: 15 June 2024).

Timor-Leste (2023) ‘Statement by Timor-Leste at COP 28’. UNFCCC Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents (Accessed: 15 June 2024).

UNFCCC COP (2019) Fourth comprehensive review of the implementation of the framework for capacity-building in developing countries under the convention.

UNFCCC Secretariat (2024a) From billions to trillions: Setting a new goal on climate finance. Available at: https://unfccc.int/news/from-billions-to-trillions-setting-a-new-goal-on-climate-finance (Accessed: 1 August 2024).

UNFCCC Secretariat (2024b) Implementation of the framework for capacity-building in developing countries. Synthesis report.

Viet Nam (2023) ‘Statement by Viet Nam at COP 28’. UNFCCC Secretariat. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents (Accessed: 15 June 2024).

Vihma, A., Mulugetta, Y. and Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. (2011) ‘Negotiating solidarity? The G77 through the prism of climate change negotiations’, Global Change, Peace & Security, 23(3), pp. 315–334. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2011.601853.

Wardhani, B. (2023) ‘The legacy of colonialism and ecological genocide on indigenous people of Nauru’, Andalas Journal of International Studies, XII(1), pp. 13–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25077/ajis.12.1.13-26.2023.

Whyte, K.P. (2018) ‘Indigenous science (fiction) for the anthropocene: Ancestral dystopias and fantasies of climate change crises’, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1–2), pp. 224–242. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618777621.

Williams, M. (2005) ‘The third world and global environmental negotiations: Interests, institutions and ideas’, Global Environmental Politics, 5(3), pp. 48–69. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/1526380054794826.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.