Dinamika Persenjataan di Asia Tenggara, 2010-2015

Iwan Sulistyo

Abstract

States, however, are still the main actors in International Relations. Although the Cold War had formally ended in 1991, as a matter of fact, the military competition still exists, including at the regional level. This article attempts to analyze the arms dynamic in Southeast Asia during the 2010-2015 periods. By using three models – action-reaction model, the domestic structure model, and the technological imperative – simultaneously and analyzing the data published by both the IISS and SIPRI, this study shows that conflict in the South China Sea had been the primary motive of several countries in increasing their military spending and enhancing their military capabilities, both qualities as well as quantities. Several countries accelerating their military strength had been Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, the Philippines, Myanmar, Thailand, and Indonesia. However, Singapore had been the leading actor that has significant efforts in strengthening its military power. Relizing the difficulty to identify the actual motives of these several countries enlarging their hard power, the author argues that, within this arms dynamic, there is also a possibility or even the long-term tendency in terms of arms race as long as these major actors that relates directly to the South China Sea territorial conflict are not able carefully to maintain their security dilemma and perceived threats.

 

Kata Kunci: Arms dynamic, Southeast Asia, military capability

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buzan, Barry, An Introduction to Strategic Studies: Military Technology and International Relations (London: MacMillan Press, 1987).

Collins, Alan, The Security Dilemmas of Southeast Asia (London: MacMillan Press, 2000).

IISS, The Military Balance 2012 (London: the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2012).

IISS, The Military Balance 2013 (London: the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2013).

IISS, The Military Balance 2014 (London: the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2014).

IISS, The Military Balance 2015 (London: the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2015).

IISS, The Military Balance 2016 (London: the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2016).

IISS, The Military Balance 2016 (London: the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2016).

IISS, The Military Balance 2016 (London: the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2016).

IISS, The Military Balance 2016 (London: the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2016).

Jing Huang and Sharinee Jagtiani, ‘Introduction: Unknotting Tangled Lines in the South China Sea Dispute’ dalam dalam Jing Huang and Andrew Billo, Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea: Navigating Rough Waters (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).

Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics Among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace, 6th edn, edisi Bahasa Indonesia Politik Antarbangsa, diterjemahkan oleh S.Maimoen, A.M. Fatwan, dan Cecep Sudrajat (Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2010).

Nguyen Thi Lan Anh, ‘Origins of the South China Sea Dispute ’ dalam Jing Huang and Andrew Billo, Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea: Navigating Rough Waters (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).

NIDS, East Asian Strategic Review 2011 (Tokyo: NIDS, 2011).

NIDS, East Asian Strategic Review 2012 (Tokyo: NIDS, 2012).

NIDS, East Asian Strategic Review 2015 (Tokyo: NIDS, 2015).

Weatherbee, Donald E., International Relations in Southeast Asia: the Struggle for Autonomy. 2nd edn. (Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009).

Jurnal:

Ball, D., “Arms and Affluence: Military Acquisitions in the Asia-Pasific Region”, International Security, vol. 18, no. 3, Winter, 1993/94.

Internet:

Malcolm R. Davis, ‘Arms Races, Security Dilemmas and Territorial’, tersedia di http://epublications.bond.edu.au/eassc_publications/45/, diakses 7 Maret 2016.

SIPRI, The SIPRI Military Expenditure Database (online), , diakses 13 November 2016.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.