Asymmetric Diplomacy and Securitization in the South China Sea

Jonni Mahroza, Priyanto Priyanto, Mhd Halkis

Abstract

Securitization in the South China Sea (SCS) invites uncertainty in the current legal and diplomatic direction. The purpose of this study is to explain that the control of economic resources by involving the military has ignored the international order. The approach method is used in phenomenological research. Primary data from various sources, researcher discussions with various experts to get a comprehensive understanding. The results show that China, based on historical rights, has failed to defend the nine-dash line (NDL) before the arbitral tribunal, but China has succeeded in shifting the issue of who has the right to control uninhabited islands in the South China Sea region into a security issue. China has occupied and developed no man's coral island. The conclusion of the researcher is that a country's strategy is not enough to look at international law, but activities that may threaten to consider building new powers. The LCS securitization conflict has led to the emergence of Asimterics Diplomacy, a strategy. The reality of Chinese activity is booming. At least it has produced; polarizing the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), testing the effectiveness of international law, harnessing maritime potential, and expanding national defense lines..

Full Text:

PDF

References

References

Acharya, A. (2007). Theoretical Perspectives on International Relations in Asia. International Relations in Asia, 4 (September), 27–29.

amti.csis.org. (2020). South China Sea Energy Exploration and Development | Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. In Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative.

Andrabi, S. (2019). New wars, new victimhood, and new ways of overcoming it. Stability , 8 (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.665

South China Sea Arbitration (Philippines v China), Award on the Merits, PCA (12 July 2016), 5 Permanent Court of Arbitration 11 (2016).

Balzacq, T., Guzzini, S., Williams, MC, Wæver, O., & Patomäki, H. (2015). What kind of theory – If any – Is securitization? In International Relations (Vol. 29, Number 1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117814526606

Barry Buzan, Ole Waever, J. de W. (1998). A New Framework For Analysis . Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Batubara, M., Purwanto, WW, & Fauzi, A. (2016). Proposing a decision-making process for the development of sustainable oil and gas resources using the petroleum fund: A case study of the East Natuna gas field. Resources Policy , 49 , 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.07.010

Beech, H. (2016). South China Sea: Where Did China Get Its Nine-Dash Line? | time. In Time .

Beriker, N. (2015). Conflict Resolution: The Missing Link between Liberal International Relations Theory and Realistic Practice in Handbook of Conflict Analysis and Resolution Edited by Dennis J . D . Sandole , (Number July 2008). Routledge.

Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., & Hey, E. (2012). International Environmental Law: Mapping the Field. The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law , June , 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552153.013.0001

Buzan, B. (1993). The Logic of Anarchy. The Logic of Anarchy . https://doi.org/10.7312/buza93756

Caballero-Anthony, M. (2008). Non-traditional security and infectious diseases in ASEAN: Going beyond the rhetoric of securitization to deeper institutionalization. Pacific Review, 21 (4), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740802294523

Chinapower. (2015). How much trade transits the South China Sea? | ChinaPower Project. In Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Chongkittavorn, K. (2019). The Thailand-U . S. Defense Alliance. East-West Center , 137 .

Congressional Research Service. (2021). US-China Strategic Competition in South and East China Seas: Background and Issues for Congress; Feb. 8, 2021 - DocumentCloud .

Czechowska, L., Tyushka, A., Domachowska, A., Gawron-Tabor, K., Piechowiak-Lamparska, J., & Tyushka, A. (2019). Strategic partnerships, international politics and IR theory. In States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships (Number January). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972284,00010

Daily), Wang Hui (China. (2017). Japan should repent - Chinadaily .

Daily), WANG HUI (China. (2016). Jakarta must seek common good, not conflict at sea - Opinion - Chinadaily .

Daily, C. (2016). Jakarta lacks pragmatism at sea - Opinion - Chinadaily .

Enrico Fels (Editor), T.-MV (Editor). (2016). Power Politics in Asia's Contested Waters: Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea (Global Power Shift) . Springer.

Erickson, AS, Dutton, P., Fravel, MT, Schell, O., Weiss, JC, Friedman, E., Nagorski, T., Carlson, A., Lewis, M., Roach, SS, Ku, J. , Kardon, IB, Zhang, T., Mitchell, R., Zhang, F., Heilmann, S., & Nathan, AJ (2016). China's Claims in the South China Sea Rejected. In ChinaFile .

Fiott, D. (2014). The French Defense White Paper , 2013 : the Global Balance-of-Power and European Defense Policy The French Defense White Paper , 2013 : the Global Balance-of-Power and European Defense Policy . August .

Guard, C. (2021). China Plans to Loosen its Coast Guard's Rules on Use of Force . 1–6.

Hanggu, FP, Hutabarat, L., Harnowo, S., Defense, D., Strategy, F., & University, P. (2018). INDONESIA'S DEFENCE DIPLOMACY TO THE MEMBER STATES OF THE FIVE POWER DEFENSE ARRANGEMENTS (MALAYSIA, SINGAPORE, AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND, AND UK) YEAR 2000 – 2017 Felicia . 39–56.

Hasan, MS (2021). The South China Sea is getting hotter, Deputy Speaker of the People's Consultative Assembly: Indonesia must remain on standby . 2–4.

Herrmann, RK, & Fischerkeller, MP (1995). Beyond the enemy image and spiral model: cognitive–strategic research after the cold war. International Organization , 49 (3), 415–450.

Hong, C. (2018). Japan tests China's red line in S China Sea - USA - Chinadaily .

Howard, M. (1976). The strategic approach to international relations. British Journal of International Studies , 2 (1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500116560

Huaxia. (2020). Indonesia-Australia free trade deal takes effect minister - Xinhua English .

Jan Melissen. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy Soft Power in International Relations. In J. Melissen (Ed.), Foreign Affairs (Vol. 80, Number 5). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.2307/20500310

Jianping, X. (2014). Speech by HE Xi Jinping President of the People's Republic of China At the Körber Foundation. In Network (April Number).

Kartikasari, A. (2019). Indonesia's Image from China's Perspective on South China Sea Dispute (A Preliminary Study on China's Perception on Indonesia). Global: Journal of International Politics , 21 (2), 176. https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v21i2.404

Kembara, G. (2018). Partnership for Peace in the South China Sea. Center for Strategic and International Studies Working Paper Series .

Kurnia, I. (2009). Ida Kurnia, SH, M. Hum. Lecturer of International Law, Faculty of Law, Tarumanagara University, Jakarta, is currently studying for a doctoral program at the Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta. 117 . 117–124.

Leijten, J. (2017). Exploring the future of innovation diplomacy. European Journal of Futures Research , 5 (1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-017-0122-8

Lewis, JW, & Litai, X. (2016). China's security agenda transcends the South China Sea. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists , 72 (4), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2016.1194056

Li, R. (2016). China's Sea Power Aspirations and Strategic Behavior in the South China Sea from the Theoretical Perspective of Identity Construction (Global Power Shift). In Global Power Shift . Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26152-2_6

Loong, LH (2020). The Endangered Asian Century: America, China, and the Perils of Confrontation. In Foreign Affairs (Vol. 99, Numbers July/August, pp. 52–64).

MLR SMITH. (1995). What it is and what it isn't : 13 (1), 1–20.

O'Neill, DC (2018). Dividing ASEAN and Conquering the South China Sea. In Dividing ASEAN and Conquering the South China Sea (March Number). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv80cbrn

Office of the Secretary of Defense. (2021). Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China. Annual Report To Congress .

Parameswaran, P. (2016). What Really Happened at the ASEAN-China Special Kunming Meeting. In The Diplomat .

Paul D Shinkman. (2014). Chinese General Fang Fenghui We Don't Make Trouble, but We Aren't Afraid of It US News .

Raja Eben Lumbanrau, AK (2016). “China's Nine-Dashed Line to Natuna Like Emerging from the Sky.”

Ravenhill, J. (2013). Economics and security in the Asia-Pacific region. Pacific Review , 26 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2013.755363

Robert Beckman. (2013). THEUNCONVENTION ON THE LAWOF THE SEA AND THEMARITIME DISPUTES IN THE SOUTHCHINA SEA. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling , 53 (9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Robert Lawrence Kuhn (China Daily). (2016). Candid thoughts on South China Sea disputes - China - Chinadaily .

Rosenberg, D., & Chung, C. (2008). Maritime security in the South China Sea: Coordinating coastal and user state priorities. Ocean Development and International Law , 39 (1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320701641602

Rustandi, A. (2016). The South China Sea Dispute: Opportunities for ASEAN to enhance its policies in order to achieve resolution. The Center for Defense and Strategic Studies (CDSS) , April , 1–26.

Scobell, A., Lin, B., Shatz, H., Johnson, M., Hanauer, L., Chase, M., Cevallos, A., Rasmussen, I., Chan, A., Strong, A., Warner, E., & Ma, L. (2018). At the Dawn of Belt and Road: China in the Developing World. In At the Dawn of Belt and Road: China in the Developing World . https://doi.org/10.7249/rr2273

Sharp, P., & Sharp, P. (2018). Post-positivist theories of international relations. In Introducing International Relations . https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315099064-4

Sidibe, D. (2017). Business diplomacy: asymmetry and symmetry of power in negotiations between multinationals and governments in the case of Areva and Niger. International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy , 3 (3), 219. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijdipe.2017.10004879

Stanzel, V. (2018). New Realities in Foreign Affairs: Diplomacy in the 21st Century . November , 1–72.

States, U. (2020). Military Confrontation in the . 36 , 1–24.

Sutter, R., & Huang, C. (2013). China Gains and Advances in South China Sea. In Comparative Connections (January Number).

Toft, P. (2005). John J. Mearsheimer: An offensive realist between geopolitics and power. Journal of International Relations and Development , 8 (4), 381–408. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800065

Trang, PNM (2019). South China Sea: The Disputes and Southeast Asia's Culture of International Law. In The Diplomat .

Ury, RF and W. (1994). Getting to YES. In Nursing Administration Quarterly (Vol. 18, Number 3). https://doi.org/10.1097/00006216-199401830-00011

Woon, CY (2020). Framing the “Polar Silk Road” (冰上丝绸之路): Critical geopolitics, Chinese scholars and the (Re)Positionings of China's Arctic interests. Political Geography , 78 (December 2019), 102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102141

Xi, J. (2017). Speech by Xi Jinping at the United Nations Office at Geneva. In China.org .

Xinhua. (2015). South China Sea dispute not between ASEAN, China Cambodian PM Asia-Pacific chinadaily .

Xinhua. (2019). As old friends, Indonesia, China embrace new friendship .

Zhao, K. (2016). China's Rise and its Discursive Power Strategy. Chinese Political Science Review , 1 (3), 539–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-016-0037-8

Zhiguo Gao and Bing Bing Jia. (2013). The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications. The American Journal of International Law , 107 (1), 98–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0098

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.